[pycsw-devel] Fwd: 2.2 release blockers

Sat Nov 25 12:17:27 PST 2017

Hi all: update: almost there. I have done a last PR to bump some core
dependencies [1] which need some fixing.

Ricardo: any idea on how to asses the failures?

We will be good to cut a 2.2.0 beta after this one is fixed.

..Tom

[1] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/pull/555

On Nov 11, 2017, at 11:35, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tom,

On 11/10/2017 10:35 PM, Tom Kralidis wrote:

Hi all: update as per note 7 from our last meeting [1]:

Both blockers are now fixed in master and 2.0 branch. Unit/functional

tests pass 100%, as well as

OGC CITE CSW 2.0.2.  For OGC CITE CSW 3.0.0, we fail the online

test (there is some weird behaviour in the online tests for CSW 3 that

requires the CSW service being tested to be reset for the tests to coninue)

but fully pass when I run the tests via the command line.

I have recently tested against the beta CITE test for CSW 3.0 and
passed without issues.
This test is included in our application to remain listed as reference
implementation for the next year (to be submitted on 14 Nov through
OSGeo account on OGC portal)

I think what's remaining is an update of requirements/dependencies before

we go ahead with a beta.

+1

Ricardo: do test requirements in [2] need to be pegged or can we keep

them without

version?

Angelos: I'll do a sweep of requirements in [3].  Do you have a baseline of

versions from a packaging perspective that we should tie to?

As mentioned on the libXML ticket
(https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/issues/454) we still need to be
careful about the issue with lxml and libXML.

Cheers,
Angelos

Cheers

..Tom

[1] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Meetings-2017-10-16#notes

[2] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/blob/master/requirements-dev.txt

[3] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/blob/master/requirements.txt

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Ricardo: thanks, merged.  And thanks in advance for the tweaks

as mentioned on Gitter.

Cheers

..Tom

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da

<ricardo.garcia.silva at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tom

I've just submitted a PR on that:

https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/pull/550

Please review at your convenience.

Best regards

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all: we are getting close to a 2.2 release.  This include a significant

feature to allow for factory style plugin enhancements as well as enabling

repository plugins to handle filter parsing natively.

I"m working on the blockers but need action A3 (as per [1]).  Ricardo:

any updates

on this one?

Thanks

..Tom

https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Meetings-2017-10-16

_______________________________________________

pycsw-devel mailing list

pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org

https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel

--

___________________________ ___ __

Ricardo Garcia Silva

_______________________________________________

pycsw-devel mailing list

pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org

https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel

_______________________________________________

pycsw-devel mailing list

pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org

https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel

--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
pycsw-devel mailing list
pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel