[pycsw-devel] 2.2 release blockers

[Angelos Tzotsos]

Hi Tom,

On 11/10/2017 10:35 PM, Tom Kralidis wrote:
> Hi all: update as per note 7 from our last meeting [1]:
>
> Both blockers are now fixed in master and 2.0 branch. Unit/functional
> tests pass 100%, as well as
> OGC CITE CSW 2.0.2.  For OGC CITE CSW 3.0.0, we fail the online
> test (there is some weird behaviour in the online tests for CSW 3 that
> requires the CSW service being tested to be reset for the tests to coninue)
> but fully pass when I run the tests via the command line.

I have recently tested against the beta CITE test for CSW 3.0 and passed 
without issues.
This test is included in our application to remain listed as reference 
implementation for the next year (to be submitted on 14 Nov through 
OSGeo account on OGC portal)

>
> I think what's remaining is an update of requirements/dependencies before
> we go ahead with a beta.

+1

>
> Ricardo: do test requirements in [2] need to be pegged or can we keep
> them without
> version?
>
> Angelos: I'll do a sweep of requirements in [3].  Do you have a baseline of
> versions from a packaging perspective that we should tie to?

As mentioned on the libXML ticket 
(https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/issues/454) we still need to be 
careful about the issue with lxml and libXML.

Cheers,
Angelos

>
> Cheers
>
> ..Tom
>
> [1] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Meetings-2017-10-16#notes
> [2] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/blob/master/requirements-dev.txt
> [3] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/blob/master/requirements.txt
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ricardo: thanks, merged.  And thanks in advance for the tweaks
>> as mentioned on Gitter.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> ..Tom
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da
>> <ricardo.garcia.silva at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Tom
>>>
>>> I've just submitted a PR on that:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/pull/550
>>>
>>> Please review at your convenience.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all: we are getting close to a 2.2 release.  This include a significant
>>>> feature to allow for factory style plugin enhancements as well as enabling
>>>> repository plugins to handle filter parsing natively.
>>>>
>>>> I"m working on the blockers but need action A3 (as per [1]).  Ricardo:
>>>> any updates
>>>> on this one?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> ..Tom
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Meetings-2017-10-16
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pycsw-devel mailing list
>>>> pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ___________________________ ___ __
>>> Ricardo Garcia Silva
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pycsw-devel mailing list
>>> pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel
> _______________________________________________
> pycsw-devel mailing list
> pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos