[Pywps-dev] PyWPS-4 use in OGC's Soil Data IE

Luís de Sousa luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com
Mon Dec 21 03:18:29 PST 2015


Hi everyone,

To thebestof my knowledgewe are not going to get this working on Winblows
with Multiprocess. I suggest we leaveassync as it is for now.

Cheers,

Luis
On 21 Dec 2015 08:56, "Jachym Cepicky" <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:

> async is available in WPS 1.0.0
>
> but I'm not going to implement this for windows for pywps-4
>
> it should be working for now (tested with old good "ultimatequestion"
> process)
>
> and yes, it should be in pywps-4.0.0
>
>
> po 21. 12. 2015 v 8:44 odesílatel Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus <
> jorge.mendesdejesus at wur.nl> napsal:
>
>> Hi Jachym
>>
>> Please correct me if wrong, the async (Linux and Windows) in WPS1.0.0 is
>> not available, I think this should be in the official release of PyWPS 4.0.0
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> On 20-12-15 10:30, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>>
>> sorry, for late answer again
>>
>> IMHO
>> https://github.com/jachym/pywps-4/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22PyWPS+4.0.0+stable+version%22 this
>> fits - I'm working on https://github.com/jachym/pywps-4/issues/62
>>
>> at least logging (what process when started, when ended, resources needed
>> etc....) would be necessary
>>
>> J
>>
>> st 9. 12. 2015 v 13:43 odesílatel Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus <
>> jorge.mendesdejesus at wur.nl> napsal:
>>
>>> I think a crowfunding could be a good idea, even for the current release.
>>>
>>> What needs to be done for 4.0 to be declared a release version?
>>>
>>> Jorge
>>>
>>> On 09-12-15 12:51, Luís de Sousa wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I agree funding would be the best option, but for that we probably
>>> > need a client. And we can not get a client to a software that is not
>>> > yet officialy released. Perhaps we should focus on releasing version
>>> > 4.0 and then see what we can muster (e.g. crowd funding?) for version
>>> > 4.1.
>>> >
>>> > Luís
>>> >
>>> > On 7 December 2015 at 09:40, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> not sure, if we implemented uoms sofar
>>> >>
>>> >> I see no reason for pywps-4 being faster then 3... but what do I know?
>>> >>
>>> >> about wps 2.0.0 - finding founding would be first great step. I would
>>> be
>>> >> even available for some month work for it (or let say week every
>>> month for
>>> >> next couple of months)
>>> >>
>>> >> any ideas where to start?
>>> >>
>>> >> J
>>> >>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ISRIC - World Soil Information
>>> Post: PO box 353, 6700 AJ, Wageningen,
>>> The Netherlands Visiting Address: Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB
>>> Wageningen (Bdg. 101),
>>> Office: C.013
>>> Office Phone: +31 (0) 317 4 83715
>>> Mobile Phone: +31 (0) 613 9 06950
>>> Skype: jorge.de.jesus (Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus)
>>> OpenPGPKey: 0xA3D0065A
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> ISRIC - World Soil Information
>> Post: PO box 353, 6700 AJ, Wageningen,
>> The Netherlands Visiting Address: Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB
>> Wageningen (Bdg. 101),
>> Office: C.013
>> Office Phone: +31 (0) 317 4 83715
>> Mobile Phone: +31 (0) 613 9 06950
>> Skype: jorge.de.jesus (Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus)
>> OpenPGPKey: 0xA3D0065A
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20151221/73aeb8b1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the pywps-dev mailing list