[Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)

Sun May 3 05:58:53 PDT 2015

Thanks Jachym.  The development team can start to chip away at this,
and I can monitor/help and tweak/add.  Example in [1].

What worked for us in pycsw was calling for a sprint over IRC to
hammer through the checklist.  This approach is great for a first
pass/dump to get things moving.

Do folks think an IRC sprint (say 1-2 hours) would help?  Or a call on
the mailing list?  Something else?

..Tom

[1] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Project-Graduation-Checklist

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Jachym Cepicky
<jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've started this
>
> https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki/OSGeo_Incubation_checklist
>
> how will we approach? who will mark the items as "checked" after which
> procedure?
>
> J
>
> čt 23. 4. 2015 v 19:09 odesílatel Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
> napsal:
>>
>> I just say: thank you for keeping this warm.
>>
>> I'm all for your proposals. Will start the wiki a bit.
>>
>> J
>>
>> P.S. Sorry for long response times from myself - this spring is somehow
>> fast
>>
>> čt 23. 4. 2015 v 15:39 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>> napsal:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Jachym.  I've updated InCom and passed the motion for Board
>>> approval.
>>> I've also filed a ticket to add PyWPS to the Incubating Projects list
>>> [1].
>>>
>>> I think the next logical step here is to start tackling the project
>>> graduation
>>> checklist [2], and suggest we use the PyWPS GitHub Wiki as the area to
>>> manage
>>> the chceklist [3].
>>>
>>> Using pycsw as a recent example, [4] provides a proposal on how we
>>> tracked and
>>> managed the entire incubation process.  What do folks think?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> ..Tom
>>>
>>> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1488
>>> [2]
>>> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html
>>> [3] https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki
>>> [4] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/OSGeo-Incubation
>>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>>>
>>> > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:47:30 +0000
>>> > From: Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
>>> > To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>,
>>> >     Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>>> > Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>>> > (fwd)
>>> >
>>> > As Luis is writing and Tom concluding: PyWPS currently  == PyWPS 3
>>> >
>>> > The repositories are keeped seperated, to point out, "this is something
>>> > completely new, new philosophy, code base, license". Once is baked (at
>>> > least support for WPS 1:0.0), I would like to move it to geopython
>>> > project
>>> >
>>> > J
>>> >
>>> > pá 17. 4. 2015 v 14:16 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>>> > napsal:
>>> >
>>> >> Sounds like PyWPS = PyWPS 3, then.
>>> >>
>>> >> I think Jachym as the main contact can update incom.
>>> >>
>>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>>> >>
>>> >> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:26, Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Tom,
>>> >>
>>> >> The goal is for PyWPS 4 to support WPS 2.0, support for 1.0 is nearly
>>> >> covered, appart from assynchronous execution.
>>> >>
>>> >> As PyWPS 4 is still in development and not user ready, I would prefer
>>> >> to
>>> >> keep it in its own repo for now. Once we deem it ready for public
>>> >> release
>>> >> then we can think of merging the repos.
>>> >>
>>> >> How can the InCom be contacted? Or is it something Jachym can do?
>>> >>
>>> >> Luis
>>> >> On 16 Apr 2015 15:13, "Tom Kralidis" <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks Luis.  Can someone clarify this to InCom, then?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm wondering whether PyWPS 3 / 4 should be in the same repository,
>>> >>> with
>>> >>> 3 being master and 4 being a branch? This way the project is
>>> >>> logically
>>> >>> consistent ('PyWPS').
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Will PyWPS 4 support WPS 1.0.0?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Luís de Sousa wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>  Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:02:33 +0200
>>> >>>> From: Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>>> >>>> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>>> >>>> Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter
>>> >>>> incubation
>>> >>>> (fwd)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Hi Tom,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> These two versions are part of a same project.  Version 4 is a major
>>> >>>> step forward from version 3, but the underlying concept is the same.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> More than a re-write, PyWPS-4 is intended to deliver WPS 2.0
>>> >>>> compliance.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Luís
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 9 April 2015 at 13:54, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hi all: FYI per below for clarification as we move forward with
>>> >>>>> OSGeo
>>> >>>>> incubation.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Can someone response to Dimitris' question?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ..Tom
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
>>> >>>>> From: Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>> To: incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hi all,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> no objection in general and the project is within OSGEO scope and
>>> >>>>> has
>>> >>>>> been
>>> >>>>> around for quite a long time. But I would like to ask for a
>>> >>>>> clarification
>>> >>>>> before voting: what is the relation between PyWPS-3 and PyWPS-4 and
>>> >>>>> since
>>> >>>>> the second is written from scratch do we accept both for
>>> >>>>> incubation?
>>> >>>>> And if
>>> >>>>> so as one project?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for clarifying this,
>>> >>>>> Best regards,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Dimitris
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> >>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> pywps-dev mailing list
>>> >>>>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> >> pywps-dev mailing list
>>> >> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>>> >