[Qgis-community-team] [Qgis-developer] new commit label: [NEEDS-DOCS] for QGIS commits will also raise an issue in QGIS-Documentation

[DelazJ]

Hi,

2016-02-17 14:16 GMT+01:00 Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmailings at duif.net>:

>
> Hi Devs and Community,
>
> As requested here:
>
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/826#issuecomment-184109531
>
> There is a new version of the QGIS commit webhook (script here [0])
> installed.
>
> Besides firing on [feature] (or [FEATURE], script is now
> case-insensitive) the new version also 'listens' to the label
> [needs-docs], giving the developers a way to instruct doc writers to
> please add some extra documentation after a fix or addition to an
> already excisting functionality.
>

Thanks Richard

To have a complete list of issues for documentation (especially for
needs_docs tag), does it mean that developers should amend their previous
commits message (don't know if it's doable)  so that a grep can retrieve
these commits? Or do we consider that they are "lost" improvements reports?


> Please devs use these labels so doc writers have issues to work on and
> have an overview of things to do. BUT please also take time to add some
> text: either in the commit OR in the docs itself.
>
> A big +1. Not always easy to understand how some features should behave,
without intensive tests. The good side is that it helps bug reports :)

Regards,
Harrissou


> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> [0]
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Sysadmin/blob/master/webhooks/github_feature_tracker.cgi
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-community-team/attachments/20160217/bf7a7313/attachment.html>