[Qgis-community-team] QGIS Documentation: increase the speed of documentation writing

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Tue Sep 18 22:21:21 PDT 2018


Lots of good ideas, thanks everybody. Yves, could you please keep track
of the discussion and implement its conclusions? I think we all agree on
these. In case of doubt, please refer to PSC.

Thanks.


Il 09/18/2018 07:14 PM, Alexandre Neto ha scritto:
> Hi Yves, thanks for raising this matter.
>
> +1 for making it easier to accept and merge contributions.
>
> I would just swap the "There are typos" with the "location of the
> contributions" position. Mainly because the typos can be fixed later
> (unless there are major English problem that make the text difficult
> to understand), where contribution location can mess things up badly,
> and might be more difficult to untangle later.
>
> Maybe, we should open dedicated tickets for reviewing and
> "sphinxifying" content for non important and no blocker merged PRs (or
> remove some tags and add some others (Screenshots, Needs English
> Review, Sphinx)).
>
> Maybe we could use QGIS funds to hire someone that could tackle those
> "after content writing" tickets, which may be much easier than finding
> candidates that are both QGIS (advanced) users, good writing technical
> English, and familiar with sphinx syntax.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexandre Neto
>
> Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr <mailto:yjacolin at free.fr>> escreveu no
> dia terça, 18/09/2018 às 16:45:
>
>     Hello community and documentation contributors,
>
>     I would like to raise a discussion about the merge process in the QGIS
>     documentation.
>
>     My opinion is that the documentation process should be made easier in
>     order to increase the dynamic and the speed of feature
>     documentation. I
>     do think we try to do our best to do some doc review, but probably not
>     enough and not fast enough. We should improve this and be faster in
>     order to be closer to the QGIS feature of the current public release,
>     then look at how to improve documentation later. If features are well
>     documented, we can probably pay for someone to proof read and fix
>     english issue.
>
>     In this purpose I would like to propose some keys to help merging
>     PR and
>     I would like to get your opinion.
>
>     I would like to create three "levels" (a kind of guidelines) to
>     accept/refuse a PR, in a similar way as QGIS issues:
>
>     # Blocker (="need change" in review process)
>
>     Impossible to merge the PR because:
>
>     * Travis failed
>     * There is typos
>     * Write does not use any rst tags (:guilabel:, code-block, index,
>     title,
>     etc.)
>
>     # No blocker but important (="comment" in review process)
>
>     PR can be merged but contributors can improve it before merging
>     because:
>
>     * There is some missing rst tag
>     * Some sentences are not well written (I mean most of doc contributor
>     are not native english writer and so we are nos using the best
>     english,
>     this email is a good illustration)
>
>     # Not important, just feedback (="comment" in review process)
>
>     PR can be merged, this is mainly subjective or small changes as:
>
>     * location of the contribution
>     * need screenshot (or update)
>     * fix a problem which has not been created by the PR
>     * Not enough description
>
>     Other contribution can create issue to not forget some of this changes
>     proposals.
>
>     We already agreed on the following, but better to tell it again: small
>     fix (add rst tag, fix typos) could be merged as soon as travis is a
>     success! So please, focus in small fix outside bigger PR :)
>
>     I am looking forward to read your opinion :)
>
>     Thanks to all for your great contributions!
>
>     Y.
>
>     -- 
>     http://yjacolin.gloobe.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing community
>     resources such as documentation, translation etc..
>     Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org
>     <mailto:Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team
>
> -- 
> Alexandre Neto
> ---------------------
> @AlexNetoGeo
> http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
> http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing community resources such as documentation, translation etc..
> Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS.ORG Chair:
http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-community-team/attachments/20180919/75aaf838/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Qgis-community-team mailing list