[Qgis-developer] Trac priorities

[John C. Tull]

Those categories will be much more useful. I have always wondered the  
meanings of the categories in the past, but your suggestions will make  
it perfectly clear. IIt might also be useful to have a "Feature  
Request" category at the end to match the filing of type "Enhancement".

John

On Dec 10, 2007, at 4:28 AM, Tim Sutton wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I would like to simplify things in trac with regards to bug
> priorities. My major concern is that a) we have too many categories
> and b) the categories are not descriptive enough for lay people
> needing to file bugs. Currently we have:
>
> Possible Values
> ---------------
> blocker
> critical
> major
> minor
> trivial
>
> I propose to the following changes:
> - merge minor and trivial into a new priority 'minor: annoyance'.
> - rename major to 'major: does not work as expected'
> - merge blocker and critical into 'critical: causes crash or data  
> corruption'
>
> Any thoughts / opposition to the idea? I would make the changes as a
> batch update to the trac db.
>
> Regards
>
>
> -- 
> Tim Sutton
> QGIS Project Steering Committee Member - Release  Manager
> Visit http://qgis.org for a great open source GIS
> openModeller Desktop Developer
> Visit http://openModeller.sf.net for a great open source ecological
> niche modelling tool
> Home Page: http://tim.linfiniti.com
> Skype: timlinux
> Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.qgis.org
> http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer