[Qgis-developer] dep trouble with feisty packages

[icosa atropa]

Thanks, I'll give it a try when i have a chance.

I was wondering if a little more information could be added to the
README.txt @ http://qgis.org/uploadfiles/testbuilds/?  Knowing what to
expect, i.e. requirements, would be nice.

-xian

On 10/16/07, Matthew Perry <perrygeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, icosa atropa <icos.atropa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > I tried installing feisty packages from
> > http://qgis.org/uploadfiles/testbuilds/, but I'm still getting
> > problems with deps.
> >
> > I first did a fresh apt-get update/upgrade/dist-upgrade prior to
> > installing debs.  Still, I get stuck on libqgis1 with the following:
> >
> > xian at wrp:/usr/local/src$ sudo dpkg -i libqgis1_0.9.0_i386.deb
> > Selecting previously deselected package libqgis1.
> > (Reading database ... 71051 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Unpacking libqgis1 (from libqgis1_0.9.0_i386.deb) ...
> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqgis1:
> >  libqgis1 depends on libqt4-core (>= 4.3.0); however:
> >   Version of libqt4-core on system is 4.2.3-0ubuntu3.
>
>
> Try adding the backports repository which should have qt4.3 :
>
> deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ feisty-backports main
> restricted universe multiverse
>
> Keep in mind that the recent pyqt-dev-tools (pyuic, etc) have not been
> backported to feisty so if you're planning on doing any gui
> development work with python and qt, you'll have to tread carefully.
>
> - matt
>
>
> >  libqgis1 depends on libqt4-gui (>= 4.3.0); however:
> >   Version of libqt4-gui on system is 4.2.3-0ubuntu3.
> >  libqgis1 depends on libqt4-qt3support (>= 4.3.0); however:
> >   Version of libqt4-qt3support on system is 4.2.3-0ubuntu3.
> > dpkg: error processing libqgis1 (--install):
> >  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >  libqgis1
>
> --
> Matthew T. Perry
> http://www.perrygeo.net
>
> "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be adequately explained by
> incompetence."
>


-- 
Far better an approximate answer to the right question, which is often
vague, than the exact answer to the wrong question, which can always
be made precise -- j.w. tukey