[Qgis-developer] Re: GdalTools versions

[Giuseppe Sucameli]

I looked at the code and seems the /usr one should be preferred.
But installing GdalTools in  ~/.qgis, I cannot see it.

I'll try to find why it doesn't works as expected.

Cheers

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Borys Jurgiel <borysiasty at aster.pl> wrote:

> Dnia poniedziałek, 7 czerwca 2010 o 10:15:11 Martin Dobias napisał(a):
> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Borys Jurgiel <borysiasty at aster.pl>
> wrote:
> > >> I guess that the plugin_installer works well. The issue may be in
> > >> python/utils.py in updateAvailablePlugins function:
> > >> there are no tests to check if the local plugin is newer then the
> system
> > >> one.
> > >
> > > You're right. Martin, seems you've changed the behaviour when moving
> the
> > > code to utils.py and now the priority of plugins depends only on python
> > > paths order.
> > >
> > > Can we at least set fixed path order for 1.5?
> >
> > Umm... I'm not sure if I understand what's the problem. What else
> > should affect the priority of plugins? In current semantics, the
> > locally installed plugins in ~/.qgis are preferred to the global ones
> > in /usr. So what is the difference from previous implementation in
> > c++?
> >
> > Martin
>
> Seems they aren't really preffered. It works at mine, but Giuseppe always
> see
> the /usr ones. It's all about python paths, I'm right? I can't see any code
> preferring the ~/ ones in Qgis.
>
> Maybe I was wrong thinking that in the previous implementation the two
> paths
> were distinguished.
>



-- 
Giuseppe Sucameli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20100607/5a48754e/attachment.html