[Qgis-developer] QGIS Processing Framework

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

Sorry I just caught up on this thread now. I share Martin's concern
about dropping C++ support by adopting traits directly. Have you made
a decision on this, is C++ still on the cards?

Regards

Tim

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:46 AM, MALIK Julien <julien.malik at c-s.fr> wrote:
> Hello Camilo,
>
> Some feedback about your todo list :
>
> - constraints and validator is low priority to me : it can be handled by the
> underlying implementation for now
> - user level is low priority to me as it will probably be easy to add this
> feature later when the big things will be in shape
> - interactive parameters : higher priority to me. Having a way for the
> implementation to tell the GUI "update every widgets". Maybe I already have
> a way to do that (?)
>
> A few things you don't mention :
> - running the processing modules programmatically
> - progress reporting
> - logging
> - multiple values parameter type (at least to provide a "multiple input
> layers" parameter type)
> - parameter groups (what happen currently with the SAGA "nodes" ?)
>
> I agree with your analysis : being able to access the QGis layers for the
> input/output is now the most important thing to focus on.
>
> What precisely is blocking you on this topic ?
> I saw some recent updates adding a combobox with the layers but did not test
> it yet. The implementations could handle the conversion into their own
> internal data structure from the MapLayer objects.
> I know at least that on the OTB side, a first step will be getting a
> gdal/ogr compatible dataset name and pass them as input files to the
> implementation.
> As I can remember, SAGA has a "gdal/ogr" importer module for inputs, and the
> output should be simple also as the saga file format is supported by gdal.
>
> Regards,
> Julien
>
> Quoting Camilo Polymeris <cpolymeris at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> the end of GSoC's first term is nearing and while I think we have made
>> a significant progress, many things are still pending. I have tried to
>> identify a few and compile a short list[1], to try to keep focused
>> during the next few weeks.
>> I'll try to create a proper timeline with (some of) those items &
>> would appreciate your comments. Anything missing? Some things more
>> urgent than others?
>>
>> Of course, most of the work will revolve around the first item: Data
>> exchange. Still no clarity on how to handle that.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Camilo
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================