Rif: [Qgis-developer] Backporting bugs for 1.7.5

[Etienne Tourigny]

Would it make sense marking the master branch as 1.8 instead of having
to backport many things?

Etienne

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Werner Macho <werner.macho at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi!
> It seems that 1.8 will overrule the 1.7 branch ..
> As 1.8 prepares the way for 2.0 and has much more features than 1.7
> and it seems that 1.8 will be here in about a month (and will also
> stay a lot longer than 1.7) it seems better to concentrate on
> releasing 1.8 (I know there are still bugs in 1.7) ..
> As Paolo already said we lack in manpower to prepare 3 different
> branches (1.7, 1.8 and master).
> So please wait a little more for the Lyon HF - it seems that 1.8 is on
> its way ..
>
> After 1.8 release we will collect (and hopefully clean the bugtracker)
> new backport bugs for 1.8
>
> kind regards
> Werner
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
>> Il 02/03/2012 07:45, luca_manganelli at comune.trento.it ha scritto:
>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> I know I'm boring, but backporting requires some manpower we have difficulties
>> allocating now. Please consider helping directly with it, or sponsoring it.
>> I agree, it would be really good. We just discovered the road graph plugin is
>> non-functional, for instance.
>> All the best.
>> --
>> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
>> www.faunalia.eu
>> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer