[Qgis-developer] gsoc 2012
giohappy at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 13:18:30 EDT 2012
Ok, that's what I supposed. We're talking about two different things: your
framework and the "geoprocessing framework" that started some time ago. I
don't know if Camilo (or others) are still working actively on that.
I can imagine that your experience with the "abstraction level" development
for SEXTANTE will be an important plus to the development of such a
framework... And I hope the development will converge on one of the twos,
otherwise it would a waste of resources.
2012/3/21 Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote:
> > Hmm... so if I understand correctly now we have two frameworks:
> > ProcessingFramework (developed last year by Camilo Polymeris)
> > and SEXTANTE framework.
> > I didn't tested SEXTANTE framework yet, but seems we should
> > decide and leave only one framework to avoid confusing and
> > duplication of work
> It feels like driving drunk whenever starting qgis: every functionality
> is duplicated :D
> | __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
> | / 2.0 | http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Qgis-developer