[Qgis-developer] gsoc 2012

[G. Allegri]

Ok, that's what I supposed. We're talking about two different things: your
framework and  the "geoprocessing framework" that started some time ago. I
don't know if Camilo (or others) are still working actively on that.
I can imagine that your experience with the "abstraction level" development
for SEXTANTE will be an important plus to the development of such a
framework... And I hope the development will converge on one of the twos,
otherwise it would a waste of resources.

giovanni

2012/3/21 Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net>

> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote:
> > Hmm... so if I understand correctly now we have two frameworks:
> > ProcessingFramework (developed last year by Camilo Polymeris)
> > and SEXTANTE framework.
> >
> > I didn't tested SEXTANTE framework yet, but seems we should
> > decide and leave only one framework to avoid confusing and
> > duplication of work
>
> +1
>
> It feels like driving drunk whenever starting qgis: every functionality
> is duplicated :D
>
> --strk;
>
>  ,------o-.
>  |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
>  |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
>  `-o------'
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120321/1ea623fd/attachment-0001.html