[Qgis-developer] Approving plugins
kimaidou at gmail.com
Fri May 11 05:56:44 PDT 2012
My point of view :
2012/5/11 Alexander Bruy <alexander.bruy at gmail.com>
> There is a typo at page "ahs at least minimal documentation"
> seems here should be "has at least minimal documentation".
> Also I think we need a more clean guidelines about some
> - should plugin author include documentation in plugin package
> or it is enough to provide link to homepage with description
I think we should let plugin devs to use external page to do so, at least
the plugin wiki page in hub.qgis.org, as the hub should stay alive
> - same for test data. Should author include test data into package
> (and make plugin size bigger) or only provide link (where this link
> can be specified?)
For these reasons I think we should not force developpers to add test data :
* it increases the sise of the zip
* some plugins won't need specific data to be tested
* We can instead ask which data in the Alaska sample data can be used to
test the plugin ?
> 2012/5/11 Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:
> > Thanks for all comments. Added to http://plugins.qgis.org
> > Any objection for Nathan to take the lead on this?
> > All the best.
> > --
> > Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
> > www.faunalia.eu
> > Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
> Alexander Bruy
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Qgis-developer