[Qgis-developer] Merging of incompatible changes

[Nathan Woodrow]

There is also something else to remember here.  These changes that
Martin is proposing to merge are not the threading changes, it is the
API to allow threading to be added later.  Even without threading
being added the API update is worth it.  Having a cleaner API is
always a good thing.

Cleaner APIs == Happy developers

- Nathan

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Werner Macho <werner.macho at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Probably I missed something in Essen but to my knowledge it was always
> clear that 2.0 will have _a lot of API Changes_ .. And I missed them
> already. So now someone (Martin) is starting to bring us to a point
> where a 2.0 really earns its big number change.
> I am really looking forward to have threading (and a lot of other
> things that makes the 2 a real 2) included.
>
> For the "frozen" release .. well .. What about keeping the last
> "nightly" version before martins changes as a package on the page? -
> Will not change anything about the current situation and will keep
> people able to do their work (personally I do not expect that Martin's
> changes will break whole QGIS and I also expect that the most
> important and used plugins will get adjusted soon).
> Waiting for a 3.0 is probably way too long for such important changes
> and Martin would have to do his work a third time again ..
>
> As I already know the great community around the project - I am sure
> we will manage it somehow to keep the release straight.. with an even
> greater, faster and better QGIS 2.0.
> What about an real Roadmap? And a more or less aimed date to release
> 2.0? Is there already anything like that? I think that would probably
> focus the aim
>
> kind regards
> Werner
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alexander Bruy
> <alexander.bruy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2012/10/24 Radim Blazek <radim.blazek at gmail.com>:
>>> Is there the 2.0 changes list written on flip chart on HF somewhere on
>>> wiki? If not, I'll start one. Is there a photo?
>> As I can see from this photo [0] threading included to 2.0 roadmap but marked
>> as non-blocker
>>
>> [0] https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/ct98c2u7js7hjj842sihlbcrqpo/101650015976513787909/5796119152216619122?gpinv=AMIXal9C5Tt4fMyTp5aYiWiZ6MGahRTLPt5h6c4yenOXjeoHvm5MfOEeqVmj1cGQQDH4TrW9GYgzGqF87v4B2y__nzvM5NrPZM4GuMwKzQP47DnF6nQK_rc
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Bruy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer