[Qgis-developer] Digitizing behavior

[Salvatore Larosa]

Hi,


2013/8/20 Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>

> Hi Salvatore,
>
> I think you described it wrong: the former is on the top and not the
> latter. If the latter were at the top it would be more logical and like the
> other GIS.
>

Yes, I did mean the former is on the top and not the latter.....



>
> I agree that the current QGIS behavior is strange and I wonder why this
> happens. Aren't objects rendered by its order in a table unless there are
> other rules?
>
> Andreas
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:48:16 +0200, Salvatore Larosa wrote:
>
>> I'm noticing that while digitizing a new feature which overlaps
>> another, the latter is at the top although I expect to see it at the
>> bottom, so the new feature should overlap to the existent one.
>>
>> I was wondering if this was the correct behavior since other GIS
>> software have a different behavior.
>>
>> Do you think we can change this for the upcoming 2.0?
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer>
>



-- 
Salvatore Larosa
linkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/larosasalvatore
twitter: @lrssvt
skype: s.larosa
IRC: lrssvt on freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130820/6f03fb59/attachment-0001.html>