[Qgis-developer] Digitizing behavior

[Nathan Woodrow]

Unless it's a regression or causes data corruption I'm not a fan of making
it as a blocker.

- Nathan


On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>wrote:

> I just tried to remove the layer, add it again. Then the behavior changes
> a bit. New features still appear at the bottom, but after a save they move
> back to the top.
>
> Definitely something is broken.
>
> Can you open a blocker, Salvatore?
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:17:16 +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
>> I just tested with a new Shapefile - no difference before and after the
>> save.
>>
>> It seems that the newest feature always gets row id 0 and the other
>> features get incremented - this is very odd and against every behavior
>> of other spreadsheets and databases.
>>
>> But I am pretty sure that earlier versions did not show this behavior.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:10:40 +0200, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
>>
>>> not sure but to-be-commited features have negative IDs. It might be a
>>> reason they are rendered first.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/20/2013 11:07 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Salvatore,
>>>>
>>>> I think you described it wrong: the former is on the top and not the
>>>> latter. If the latter were at the top it would be more logical and like the
>>>> other GIS.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that the current QGIS behavior is strange and I wonder why this
>>>> happens. Aren't objects rendered by its order in a table unless there are
>>>> other rules?
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:48:16 +0200, Salvatore Larosa wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm noticing that while digitizing a new feature which overlaps
>>>>> another, the latter is at the top although I expect to see it at the
>>>>> bottom, so the new feature should overlap to the existent one.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was wondering if this was the correct behavior since other GIS
>>>>> software have a different behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think we can change this for the upcoming 2.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer>
>>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130820/5e14b7bc/attachment.html>