[Qgis-developer] QGIS 2.0 and beyond

[Nathan Woodrow]

It is indeed.

- Nathan


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.asia at gmail.com>wrote:

> So what's the hard deadline for SIP, this coming weekend?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.asia at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I feel that for the SIP upgrade to be considered so late in the release
>>> process, it should be considered within _reasonable confines_ to avoid
>>> un-managed, harmful delays. Ideally, something along the lines of "merged
>>> by this coming Sunday or delayed to post 2.0". If the attempt at
>>> upgrading SIP is turning out to be more complex and take longer than a hard
>>> commit-to-master deadline, it IMO should be postponed on practical grounds
>>> of avoiding impact on QGIS end users and adoption.
>>>
>>
>> This is the current plan.  Victor is working on updating sextante this
>> week, and Alex is working on fTools, noone has put their hands up for the
>> others (DBManger, mapserver export) yet but I will try my hand at them if I
>> get time.
>>
>> The SIP update must happen now or it can't happen in the future without
>> breaking everything yet again, and that will do more damage to the project
>> then some slight breakages in plugins while they update to 2.0.  The SIP
>> update is a easy one, for the core code base and plugin authors, and I only
>> have to check one thing with Martin before I will merge it into master
>> (after most of the core plugins are done).
>>
>> - Nathan
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130603/47dbd73f/attachment.html>