[Qgis-developer] PR1007 bump minimum to 4.7: objections?

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

On 30-11-13 01:44, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Ok - so what's the final call here? Is someone willing to make a final
> decision between bumping to 4.6 and keeping support for lucid or
> bumping to 4.7 and dropping lucid? (Looks like 4.8 is out of the
> question at the moment).
> 
> If someone can make a call I'll update the pull request and make sure
> all #ifdef's for versions < 4.6/4.7 are removed.

Hi Nyall,

if I am correct, I think the general view of devs is that a bump to 4.7
only is not worth to pull without:

1) a cleanup of stuff that is not needed anymore because of the change
2) a (good) purpose on why to do it

one of the devs told me: "why not a good PR with
1) the bump
2) the cleanup
3) the new stuff

I think this whole discussion is because of different ideas about this
kind of pull requests between different people.

@psc maybe we should write down this kind of things in governance?

@nyall is a PR like above doable for you?

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde