[Qgis-developer] PR1007 bump minimum to 4.7: objections?

[Nyall Dawson]

On 30 November 2013 20:31, Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmailings at duif.net> wrote:

>
> one of the devs told me: "why not a good PR with
> 1) the bump
> 2) the cleanup
> 3) the new stuff
>
> I think this whole discussion is because of different ideas about this
> kind of pull requests between different people.
>
> @psc maybe we should write down this kind of things in governance?
>
> @nyall is a PR like above doable for you?
>

Looks like Jürgen has beaten me to it -- thank you!!

Nyall