[Qgis-developer] Qgis-developer Digest, Vol 95, Issue 94

[Filipe Dias]

I agree with Giovanni. QGIS 2.0 introduced a huge amount of new features
and it is not reasonable to expect the first version that comes out is
without major issues. For example in the weeks before the release there
were a number of problems with the nightly builds which prevented many
users from testing the new features.

As an end user I'd rather have more consolidated version of QGIS 2.0 (which
is, by any standards, awesome and way superior to ArcGIS and other freen
and commercial softwares) than see the project rushing to 2.1 without
addressing the issues have and will continue surfacing in the next weeks.

Regards



On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Giovanni Manghi <
giovanni.manghi at faunalia.pt> wrote:

> > Maybe I missed the memo, but there is now a 2.0.2 release designation for
> > tagging issues in the hub.qgis.org tracker. Is there some timeline
> > concerning a 2.0.2 release? If so, where?
> >
> > I have been scheduling my work sessions around the expectation of a 2.1
> > release and have not anticipated a sooner one. Likewise, do we currently
> > have any timeline goals for a 2.1 release?
>
>
> I don't know if there is really a 2.0.2 release programmed, what I
> know is that there are couple of nasty regressions (like the field
> calculator that gives wrong results with otfr on, that have been
> noticed just before the 2.0 release) that would certainly deserve a
> 2.0.2 release.
>
> just my opinion.
>
> cheers
>
> -- G --
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130926/7ba3422a/attachment.html>