[Qgis-developer] Resurrecting the RFC (QEP - QGIS Enhancement Proposal)

Nyall Dawson nyall.dawson at gmail.com
Sun Aug 24 02:44:43 PDT 2014


On 24/08/2014 7:41 pm, "Marco Hugentobler" <marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch>
wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall
>
> Having another process to nominate QEP voters sounds too complicated to
me.
>
>
> >not everyone on the psc is a developer or has c++ coding experience
>
> There is a mix of coders and non-coders in the PSC on purpose. Developers
sometimes have a narrow point of view, so it is good that also
non-developers have a say. In the discussion part of the QEP, the
consequences for users can be mentioned. I don't consider that a problem,
even for very technical subjects (and even those usually have somehow an
influence on the users of a software).

OK, fair enough. But would non-psc members be able to comment on proposals?

>
> I'm putting RFC/QEP on the agenda to discuss at the next PSC meeting (
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_5_September_2014).

Great to hear - thanks!

Nyall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140824/ad2eb256/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list