[Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] A discussion: is qgis still affordable in Europe if it violate the Inspire directive ?

[aperi2007]

Hi,

just for completation
(have I apologize before for my trmendous english ?)

The specs OGC WMS 1.3.0 final approval is dated year 2006.
http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=14416

 >Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.
 >Date: 2006-03-15
 >Reference number of this document: OGC® 06-042
 >Version: 1.3.0
 >Category: OpenGIS® Implementation Specification
 >Editor: Jeff de la Beaujardiere
 >OpenGIS® Web Map Server Implementation Specification
 >Copyright © 2006 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Regards,

Andrea.

Il 08/06/2014 20:56, aperi2007 ha scritto:
>
> Il 08/06/2014 15:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
>> You can help to make QGIS server more standards compliant, but you have
>> to properly document this (with links to specifications) and find a
>> developer willing to work on this.
>>
>> I am quite confident that these issues can be resolved.
>
> Sorry Andras
> thx for your attention to this question, but
> I'm not able to do what you say.
>
> The specs:
> What specs are you say ?
>
> I have the iso specs of WMS 1.3.0 but they are payable.
> Not availables to no one for free.
>
> Instead on internet there are the OGC specs that are pretty equals.
> They are free and available to everyone.
> I sufficient to goto OGC download and read.
>
>> developer willing to work on this.
>
> Also this is not clear to me.
> :)
>
> I have just patched my server.
> Why I should pay another to do the same think ?
>
> Probably the problem is that the solution I apply is not so graceful 
> to others
> :)
>
> We don't need the GetStle and GetPrint command.So for us is absolutely 
> not imortant to preserve them.
>
> The GetStyles is not available on GGeoserver and on MApServer , and we 
> plan to create a federation of WMS servers
> where every users use the wms server it like better.
> But surely not plan to use a not standard wms server.
> So no interest for GetStyle and GetPrint
> command.
>
> So why I should pay to preserve them ?
>
> We pay many really many money in these year for QGIS.
> And just now start to pay again because after three month qgis 2.4 
> start with another break that break some plugin we realize some time ago.
> And more probably at the next 2.6 release should be again to pay for 
> another break.
>
> And just now we have payed to our actual QGIS partner to resolve some 
> serious bg on SVG managing and also to support better the SVG on
> qgis-server.
> These are all ok for us. We are happy to fund the resolution of these 
> bugs.
>
> And I suppose other public administration do as us.
>
> Also we plan some other enhancement to QGIS.
> (francly I guess it will be the last)
>
> But I don't like to pay for something that is not interested for us.
>
> I'm capable now to transform my server qgis in a compliant wms server.
> I simpli remove the GetStyle and GetPrint from the getcapabilities 
> response.
> Is easy and cheap.
>
> I guess the problem to move the GetStyle and GetPrint in an 
> enhancement section of getcapabilites should be fund by
> who has interest to have a compliant qgis-server but also interest to 
> have and use a proprietary solution like GetPrint.
>
> We are not interested to save the GetStyle and GetPrint.
>
> Why I should pay someone else?
> To do what I have just do ?
>
> For who interest in my change to code it is easy.
> in a unique file .c change three or four row of code and comment other 
> 7-8 row.
>
> However I put the code sample in the ticket I opened yesterday .
> So who interested find all on it.
>
> regards,
>
> Andrea.
>
> Il 08/06/2014 15:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
>> You can help to make QGIS server more standards compliant, but you have
>> to properly document this (with links to specifications) and find a
>> developer willing to work on this.
>>
>> I am quite confident that these issues can be resolved.
>