[Qgis-developer] Four month cycle too fast
Nathan Woodrow
madmanwoo at gmail.com
Thu Jun 19 01:51:48 PDT 2014
I'm going to learn more towards a longer dev cycle. 4 months open, 2 month
feature freeze.
Of course I'm also pro stable release but there is less need if you have
more time to fix bugs.
- Nathan
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:
> Il 19/06/2014 10:32, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
>
> > Alex, big corps are real people, trying to do their best to test qgis
>
> Hi all.
> I acknowledge the problem, and I understand well its implications. I think
> a proper
> solution is not having longer release cycles (we had them before, without
> major
> improvements over the current situation), but backporting fixes over to a
> stable
> version, having more tests and QA.
> IMHO, this effort should be covered by big corps, who have the power and
> the interest
> to do it.
> I'm available to help organizing this if someone is interested.
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140619/baee5137/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list