[Qgis-developer] GRASS & QGIS: the future

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Thu Mar 27 04:40:45 PDT 2014

Il 27/03/2014 12:33, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
> I would vote for dropping the plugin and just updating the processing
> plugin.  Having both ways is bad for us and bad for users, even worse
> when some functions are missing from one but not in the other.

I understand well the point; however, the plugin has additional
functions, e.g.:
* a grass shell
* a grass data browser
* a grass digitizing environment.
Whether these are important or not, it's a matter of users.
All the best.

Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html

More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list