[Qgis-developer] QGIS 3.0?

Geodrinx geodrinx at gmail.com
Sat Nov 8 00:11:40 PST 2014


Hello Nathan,

> Personally I think we should still do 2.8, LTR it, and then we can do 3.0 for the next release. 
> 
> Breaking the API again without a LTR in place makes me nervous as the 2.0 API really wasn't that long ago.

+1000  for  LTS

I am with you:  please, stop to change the api. 
If we like new functions, please add them, without change old ones. 

Thank you

Roberto

> 
> - Nathan
> 
> On Sat Nov 08 2014 at 4:11:34 PM Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm just wondering - given a few large changes coming up, including:
>> - qt5 support, possibly breaking plugins
>> - potential composer redesign, breaking api
>> - geometry rework, where an api break would result in a better
>> foundation moving forward
>> 
>> ... is it worth exploring the idea of making the next release QGIS 3.0
>> and breaking API? I know the original plan was for 3.0 to coincide
>> with python 3 support, but that doesn't appear to be anywhere on the
>> horizon yet.
>> 
>> Nyall
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20141108/2b473c23/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list