[Qgis-developer] Stability (2.8 LTS) vs development (3.0), a proposed way forward

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Mon Nov 10 05:40:41 PST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all.

Il 10/11/2014 13:13, Jonathan Moules ha scritto:

> Then why not fix the bugs and require them to be backported? I
> know that seems flippant, but is there a reason that backporting by
> the submitter/committer can't be required for any bugfix submitted?
> If a bugfix breaks other stuff, then either the bugfix should be
> regressed or the breakage fixed with another fix.

Agreed. Please consider, however, that this generally not something
that comes for free, and it will increase the cost of the bugfix, so
the customers must be clearly aware of this.

All the best.
- -- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlRgwFkACgkQ/NedwLUzIr67jACdHvj10iJOnyFZAQL3iZedquqF
ingAnRqGBy5hs2mKjCbWvlppuwo5+h71
=y+Y+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list