[Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Matthias Kuhn]

+0 for RFC,
since I have not figured out the meaning of PEP for a long time while 
reading it repeatedly (because I had more important things to do than 
to look the meaning up)

Regards,
Matthias

On Die 02 Sep 2014 15:06:41 CEST, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
> +1 for RFC, since universally understood.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
>> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
>> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
>> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>
>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
>> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
>> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
>> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC
>> process.
>>
>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry Shaffer
>> Dakota Cartography
>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> --
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer