[Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Marco Hugentobler]

+1 for RFC, since universally understood.

Regards,
Marco

On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), 
> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to 
> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the 
> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
>
> QEP or RFC?
>
> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>
> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should 
> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in 
> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo 
> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC 
> process.
>
> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as 
> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry Shaffer
> Dakota Cartography
> Black Hills, South Dakota
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


-- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140902/14b4b9bd/attachment.html>