[Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Denis Rouzaud]

+1 for RFC because it's a "standard" and there's already enough acronyms 
around.


On 02.09.2014 15:53, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
>
> +1 to QEP
>
> Mainly because the name is clear. I didn't know what RFC was when I 
> first started so google sorted that out and it will for QEP for new 
> users. If you are going to write a QEP/RFC you are already involved so 
> you will know what it is, we will make it clear on the website. Its 
> also nice and personal for the project like PEP is for Python.
>
> On Sep 2, 2014 11:19 PM, "Andreas Neumann" <a.neumann at carto.net 
> <mailto:a.neumann at carto.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I also prefer RFC.
>
>     Andreas
>
>     Am 02.09.2014 13 <tel:02.09.2014%2013>:06, schrieb Marco Hugentobler:
>     > +1 for RFC, since universally understood.
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Marco
>     >
>     > On 02.09.2014 15 <tel:02.09.2014%2015>:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>     >> Hi,
>     >>
>     >> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
>     >> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
>     >> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
>     >> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
>     >>
>     >> QEP or RFC?
>     >>
>     >> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>     >>
>     >> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
>     >> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
>     >> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
>     >> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older,
>     existing RFC
>     >> process.
>     >>
>     >> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not
>     be as
>     >> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >>
>     >> Larry Shaffer
>     >> Dakota Cartography
>     >> Black Hills, South Dakota
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Qgis-developer mailing list
>     >> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>     <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>     >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Dr. Marco Hugentobler
>     > Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
>     > Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
>     > marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch
>     <mailto:marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch> http://www.sourcepole.ch
>     > Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Qgis-developer mailing list
>     > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>     <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>     > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-developer mailing list
>     Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140902/e00b5d3b/attachment.html>