[Qgis-developer] Certificate update QGIS servers

[Neumann, Andreas]

Hi Richard, 

Thank you for dealing with this very annoying issue. It is easy to ruin
a good reputation, but not so easy to gain one. 

And it is especially annoying if such warnings to not provide enough
meaningful information to fix such warnings. 

Andreas 

On 2015-08-07 10:26, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: 

> On 06-08-15 22:45, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> 
>> So Richard - could you try to follow the Webmaster Tools link and see if
>> we can get more information?
> 
> Did that. Does NOT give any information...
> 
> It seems to have something to do with using httpS when visiting
> https://www.qgis.org [1]
> because visiting
> https://qgis.org [2] is ok...
> 
> My quess is/was that we had/have spam links in our wiki, but as said,
> Google gives you the possibility to list the tainted url's... but that
> list is emtpy :-(
> 
> I've asked for a new 'review' now from Google. Which can take up 24
> hours they say...
> 
>> The other thing to check is if the very recent certificate updates maybe
>> trigger this warning?
> 
> mmm, should not be the case, I think it is a coincident that Matthias
> check/found this.
> 
> But I even reverted the certificate now (you should see that it is still
> valid until 18-10-15), but according to Google we are still tainted...
> 
> Let's see what the which verdict is given by Google-UberMaster after
> their review ...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Richard Duivenvoorde
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [3]

 

Links:
------
[1] https://www.qgis.org
[2] https://qgis.org
[3] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150807/1333ca38/attachment-0001.html>