[Qgis-developer] Bug in symbol size data-defined override

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Fri Jun 5 10:15:55 PDT 2015


On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Neto <senhor.neto at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
>
> Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be working
> as it should. Comparing a layer where the marker size is set to 50 and
> another where we use 50 as an expression in data-defined override, they do
> not look the same, and I guess they should.
>
> Can anyone can confirm this, whether in 2.8 or in master?
>

​Confirmed in 2.8.2 (Nightly OSGeo4W): data-defined size 5 is much smaller
than normally configured 5.

This problem seems fixed in master though.

Best wishes,
Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150605/727ebc85/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list