[Qgis-developer] ELSE expression is used when other rules are set not visible - Feature or Bug?

[Alexandre Neto]

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>
wrote:

>  Exactly - these are good terms to use - "disabled rule" and "invisible
> rule". Thanks for suggesting these, Andreas. Alexandre - could you please
> note this in the ticket?
>
> Andreas
>
>
Not sure if this was what Matthias meant.

Anyway, I have created a ticket summing up this thread and further
discussion can continue in there.

https://hub.qgis.org/issues/13022

Alexandre



>
> On 19.06.2015 16:33, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> Just my 2 cents on a topic I know nothing about :)
>
> ... or we can have a "disable rule" and an "invisible rule". Disabled
> rules go to ELSE, invisible rules don't go to ELSE.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 06/19/2015 04:13 PM, Alexandre Neto wrote:
>
>  So, can I open a ticket?
>
>  Alexandre
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>
> wrote:
>
>>  In my opinion this is a bug. I agree that by switching off the rule
>> should not make the features fall into the ELSE rule. At least from a
>> usability point of view. Or we need to ELSE rules - a "TRUE ELSE" rule that
>> behaves like now and an "ELSE" rule that behaves like the users expect it
>> to behave.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>> On 19.06.2015 13:36, Etienne Trimaille wrote:
>>
>>  I've this kind of bug too.
>>
>> If you create a categorized symbology, apply the change and then switch
>> to a ruled-based symbology (keeping the previous rules), you will see that
>> the ELSE statement will draw features twice.
>>
>> Enable "show feature count" to check.
>>
>>  I didn't check if there is a ticket for that.
>>
>>
>> 2015-06-19 13:18 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Neto <senhor.neto at gmail.com>:
>>
>>>  Indeed Nathan,
>>>
>>>  But do you thinks that is what you were expecting? when you turn the
>>> "layer" off?
>>>
>>>  Alexandre
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would say they are getting skipped in the rule check so fall into the
>>>> else rule.
>>>>
>>>>   On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 9:05 pm Alexandre Neto <senhor.neto at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   Using the rule-based symbology with several rules and an ELSE
>>>>> expression. If you, in map canvas legend, set a rule "layer" to invisible,
>>>>> all it's features will be represented with the ELSE Symbol.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if this is the expected behaviour. I would expect that those
>>>>> feature would simply became invisible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I open a ticket?
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>  Alexandre Neto
>>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing listQgis-developer at lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing listQgis-developer at lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150622/aa364b68/attachment-0001.html>