[Qgis-developer] Potentially serious performance regression in new geometry - should 2.10 be delayed?

[Nathan Woodrow]

+1 to full postpone for me. I don't like the idea of shipping something
that is slower and snapping is slow. Those are core features of a GIS.

Nathan

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 3:22 pm Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 23 June 2015 at 13:42, Martin Dobias <wonder.sk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One heretic idea at the end - what others think about postponing the
> > release of the new geometry architecture to 2.12 so that there is more
> > time to address the current issues (fix performance, fix high memory
> > consumption, clean up API, write unit tests). It seems to me that some
> > of the issues would be difficult to address even if the release of
> > 2.10 is moved by another week or so.
>
> I'd be a cautious +1 to this - but I'm also concerned about the impact
> of reverting this work now. Scary stuff, but like you said, I'm not
> confident we can get the new geometry work into a release-ready shape
> in 3 days... (Also, who is expected to do this? AFAIK all the
> sponsored bug fixing has been exhausted for 2.10).
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150623/e54ff9ff/attachment.html>