[Qgis-developer] 2.8.2?

[Matthias Kuhn]

On 03/23/2015 10:31 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:24:19AM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 03/23/2015 10:01 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>>> I suggest creating a new 2.8.3 target in hub then, and start moving issues
>>> there (those that are not regressions introduced by 2.8.1, if any).
>>>
>>> Then, by *requiring* that any commit in 2.8 *must* reference a ticket
>>> in hub, release management can happen from there (hub), allowing for
>>> a per-ticket discussion (if needed).
>> What's the benefit compared to inspecting the git log with optional
>> references to tickets where available?
>> Discussions may as well be attached to a commit or pull request.
> Discussion in commit/PR are both under full control by github,
> HUB is in the hands of QGIS developers. Ticketting system allows
> to attach a milestone to the issue, postponing if agreed. It also
> allows to query for "all issues fixed in version X" which is easier
> to answer than associating a (usually higher) number of commits to
> the corresponding issue.
It may just be me, but I don't think any of this brings a huge benefit.
The rule also brings some overhead. When I find a bug that's not in the
tracker I prefer to just fix it and describe what has been done in the
commit message. Creating an issue for that is a bit cumbersome.

Matthias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150323/1569ae7a/attachment.pgp>