[Qgis-developer] QEP - Proposal for QGIS 3.0 after 2.14

Junior delazj at gmail.com
Sat Oct 24 04:52:44 PDT 2015


Hi,
i think that 3.0 should Also be the occasion to reorganize plugins world. Not just upgrade them, it should be the time to say no to redundant plugins and find a way to somehow oblige developers to put their energy on a single plugin, instead of three almost identical with sometimes buggy features. It would a great step in consistency and coherence for users.

Envoyé depuis mon HTC

----- Reply message -----
De : "Nyall Dawson" <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
Pour : "Paolo Cavallini" <cavallini at faunalia.it>
Cc : "qgis-developer" <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
Objet : [Qgis-developer] QEP - Proposal for QGIS 3.0 after 2.14
Date : sam., oct. 24, 2015 13:20

On 24 Oct 2015 22:06, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:

>

> Il 24/10/2015 12:57, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:

>

> > We do have to keep SOME say in the release plans/schedule... I don't

> > think we can satisfy everyone and even sponsors need to fit in with the

> > bigger picture.

> >

> > I'm also sure there's a lot of commercial sponsors out there who would

> > love the idea of a go-slow leading up to the next LTR and final 2.0

> > series release.

>

> OK, got it.

> All the best, and thanks!

BTW I don't think there's any need for a second alternative QEP. The plans seem to be solidifying well and everyone seems to be satisfied with the general direction this discussion is going. So I'll update my original QEP to reflect this and then we can hopefully move it up to voting.
Nyall

>

> --

> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu

> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151024/052663ff/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list