[Qgis-developer] QEP - Proposal for QGIS 3.0 after 2.14

[Matthias Kuhn]

On 10/25/2015 08:23 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
>
> Of course we can develop it without breaking anything if done in a
> branch.  But having a plan around all this is the point of all this I
> think just so we are all on the same page
>
>

We do (most likely) not need to keep it in a separate branch. Just like
we do not have a Qt5 branch. It's all in master.

My point is:

If we think about taking the step towards QGIS 3 with py3 and pyqt5
anytime soon, then the first steps are clear anyway. And probably not
even too hard.

Having a plan is good. Having a plan based on solid knowledge is better.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20151025/b7635929/attachment.sig>