[Qgis-developer] Any UI/UX plans for QGIS3?

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

Ok, done:

https://github.com/qgis/qgis3_UIX_discussion

@Alexandre, can you please check if you can add/edit issues now? Without 
giving you commit rights?

Then if that is ok (and everybody can at least create issues) I give you 
commit rights so you can close issues.

Let's see if this works!

Regards,

Richard

On 02-12-16 09:47, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Thanks!
>
> I can do the gardening.
>
> Alex Neto
>
>
> A sex, 2/12/2016, 08:45, Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmailings at duif.net
> <mailto:rdmailings at duif.net>> escreveu:
>
>     On 01-12-16 19:48, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > On 1 Dec 2016 11:28 PM, "DelazJ" <delazj at gmail.com
>     <mailto:delazj at gmail.com>
>     > <mailto:delazj at gmail.com <mailto:delazj at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi,
>     >
>     >     Apologies if I misread some comments above but I'm afraid we are
>     >     moving from what Alexandre was mentionning in his first post
>     (in any
>     >     case, the way I understood it): add consistency to the
>     features QGIS
>     >     already provide (and among those features). While I'm also
>     >     interested in some requests (such as "bad layers handling" - I
>     like
>     >     the way InDesign manage broken links), I wonder if this kind of
>     >     request should not be kept for the hub as it's a new feature.
>     >
>     >     Richard mentioned a place where 3.0 requests were listed. Is
>     it this
>     >     one https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/
>     >     <https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/> ? While it's supposed to be
>     >     api oriented, maybe we can extend it and allow to list/discuss and
>     >     filter (in a more organized way) all UI/UX thingies that worth
>     a fix
>     >     before 3.0 lands.
>     >     In this way, anyone that wants to help can pick an issue and ask
>     >     pointers from devs if/when needed.
>     >
>     >
>     > I'm not a fan of mixing the two. Maybe a new repo could be made
>     for 3.0
>     > ui suggestions, but just like this thread it's going to get filled
>     with
>     > a thousand unrelated feature requests ;)
>     >
>     > The api repo is a nice clean list of stuff that HAS to be done before
>     > 3.0 release or we miss the opportunity. Ui can always be addressed
>     in a
>     > future 3.x release.
>
>     Ok, what about the following:
>
>     - I create an Repo: https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_UIX solely for the
>     creation/discussion of ideas as tickets?
>
>     'Some people' have to do some gardening there then, like cleaning up
>     duplicates etc. Volunteers for that? I can give you on that repo then.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Richard Duivenvoorde
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-developer mailing list
>     Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>     List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>     Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> --
> Alexandre Neto
> ---------------------
> @AlexNetoGeo
> http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
> http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>