[Qgis-developer] Any UI/UX plans for QGIS3?
Alexandre Neto
senhor.neto at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 02:35:22 PST 2016
Richard, I can add issues. so we are good. thanks!
Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmailings at duif.net> escreveu no dia sexta, 2/12/2016
às 09:05:
>
> Ok, done:
>
> https://github.com/qgis/qgis3_UIX_discussion
>
> @Alexandre, can you please check if you can add/edit issues now? Without
> giving you commit rights?
>
> Then if that is ok (and everybody can at least create issues) I give you
> commit rights so you can close issues.
>
> Let's see if this works!
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> On 02-12-16 09:47, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > I can do the gardening.
> >
> > Alex Neto
> >
> >
> > A sex, 2/12/2016, 08:45, Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmailings at duif.net
> > <mailto:rdmailings at duif.net>> escreveu:
> >
> > On 01-12-16 19:48, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1 Dec 2016 11:28 PM, "DelazJ" <delazj at gmail.com
> > <mailto:delazj at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:delazj at gmail.com <mailto:delazj at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Apologies if I misread some comments above but I'm afraid we
> are
> > > moving from what Alexandre was mentionning in his first post
> > (in any
> > > case, the way I understood it): add consistency to the
> > features QGIS
> > > already provide (and among those features). While I'm also
> > > interested in some requests (such as "bad layers handling" - I
> > like
> > > the way InDesign manage broken links), I wonder if this kind of
> > > request should not be kept for the hub as it's a new feature.
> > >
> > > Richard mentioned a place where 3.0 requests were listed. Is
> > it this
> > > one https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/
> > > <https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/> ? While it's supposed
> to be
> > > api oriented, maybe we can extend it and allow to list/discuss
> and
> > > filter (in a more organized way) all UI/UX thingies that worth
> > a fix
> > > before 3.0 lands.
> > > In this way, anyone that wants to help can pick an issue and
> ask
> > > pointers from devs if/when needed.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not a fan of mixing the two. Maybe a new repo could be made
> > for 3.0
> > > ui suggestions, but just like this thread it's going to get filled
> > with
> > > a thousand unrelated feature requests ;)
> > >
> > > The api repo is a nice clean list of stuff that HAS to be done
> before
> > > 3.0 release or we miss the opportunity. Ui can always be addressed
> > in a
> > > future 3.x release.
> >
> > Ok, what about the following:
> >
> > - I create an Repo: https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_UIX solely for
> the
> > creation/discussion of ideas as tickets?
> >
> > 'Some people' have to do some gardening there then, like cleaning up
> > duplicates etc. Volunteers for that? I can give you on that repo
> then.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard Duivenvoorde
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> > --
> > Alexandre Neto
> > ---------------------
> > @AlexNetoGeo
> > http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
> > http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
>
> --
Alexandre Neto
---------------------
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20161202/4f78d612/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list