[Qgis-developer] Help us plan for QGIS 3.0

Tom Chadwin tom.chadwin at nnpa.org.uk
Wed Jan 20 01:28:16 PST 2016

> Just an idea: what about a 2.16 being an LTR rather than the 2.14 ? 

Counter-argument. This breaks the only newly established LTR release cycle
which is cited as very attractive to corporate users.

View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Help-us-plan-for-QGIS-3-0-tp5245740p5246247.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list