[Qgis-developer] Help us plan for QGIS 3.0

Matthias Kuhn matthias at opengis.ch
Wed Jan 20 00:25:49 PST 2016


On 01/19/2016 11:48 AM, Hugo Mercier wrote:
> Just an idea: what about a 2.16 being an LTR rather than the 2.14 ?

That would address some of the concerns brought up.
I like the idea.


Matthias Kuhn
OPENGIS.ch - https://www.opengis.ch
Spatial • (Q)GIS • PostGIS • Open Source

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160120/fc117914/attachment.sig>

More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list