[Qgis-developer] typo in blog post?

[Matthias Kuhn]

Hi Tim (cc list),

just reading the latest blog post, an important topic, really good to
cover this ground in a blog post like this. Thank you very much.

Just some thoughts about it:

Under the terms of this license, it is a requirement that all plugins
distributed via http://plugins.qgis.org <http://plugins.qgis.org/> (or
through other repositories that may be self-hosted) should comply with
the GPL version 2 or greater license.

 - Should that be "must comply"?
 - Why are the repositories mentioned as precondition here? I think the
current version can lead to think that distributing outside of a
repository system will void the need for a GPL license.

This license is provided with every copy of the QGIS and in the source
code and is available on our web site here.

 - Should that be "with every copy of QGIS"?

Best regards and have a nice day
Matthias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160602/0b1bf2d9/attachment.html>