[Qgis-developer] georeferencer projective transformation in 2.14

Wed May 18 22:17:42 PDT 2016

Hi Lene,

While I acknowledge that this is a bug and should be fixed - why do you 
have to use the projective method and not any of the other ones? In fact 
I never used the projective one, but either linear or helmert for raster 
content that is not distorted within the image or thin plate spline for 
raster content that needs a lot of control points and needs a lot of 
local adjusting.

What is the specific reason to use "projective" as opposed to the other 
methods?

Why the target was moved to 2.16 I don't know. 2.14 is a LT release and 
I think/hope that there will be several updates to 2.14 in the future. 
Or maybe it was meant that it will be fixed in 2.16 and then backported ...

Greetings,
Andreas

On 19.05.2016 03:57, Lene Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Since 2.14 it has not been possible to georeferencing an image.
>
> There are a bugreport on the issue http://hub.qgis.org/issues/14551 
> with a priority: Blocker.
>
> There is a comment ·*Target version* changed from /Version 2.14/ to 
> /Version 2.16/
>
> What does that mean?
>
> Regards
>
> *Lene Fischer*
>
> Associate Professor
>
> *Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management*
>
> University of Copenhagen
>
> MOB +45 40115084
>
> lfi at ign.ku.dk <mailto:lfi at ign.ku.dk>
>
> cid:image001.gif at 01D03029.2F3EC6A0
>
> *Fra:*Qgis-developer [mailto:qgis-developer-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] 
> *På vegne af *Tim Sutton
> *Sendt:* 18. maj 2016 20:55
> *Til:* Junior Delaz
> *Cc:* qgis-community; QGIS Developer Mailing List
> *Emne:* Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-community-team] Moving the install 
> instructions to a more sexy, visible, coherent and translatable page 
> in qgis.org
>
> Hi
>
>     On 18 May 2016, at 12:49, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com
>     <mailto:delazj at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     2016-05-18 8:24 GMT+02:00 Tim Sutton <tim at kartoza.com
>     <mailto:tim at kartoza.com>>:
>
>     Hi
>
>     After rereading the thread I think I am +1 for moving to RST in
>     the QGIS Docs repo with the following thinking:
>
>     Is the Doc repo a better candidate for this (if we get the go!)
>     than QGIS website?
>
> Sorry yes, you are correct, the Web site is the better place.
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> * QGIS Website is always translatable, so can easily show the most 
> recent procedure in different languages. It also provides a chapter on 
> development steps, might be worth having this beside.
>
> * Using website, we have a unique hyperlink (to use in our 
> communication if needed) instead of having to update it after each 
> released doc
>
> * testing doc (which in the ideal world, is related to master) is not 
> to be translated
> * not all QGIS versions are/will be documented: the last doc provided 
> is 2.8. The next should be 2.14 (btw, still looking for volunteers to 
> write it - around 80 issues remaining and not the least) but when will 
> be the release?
>
>     * all the good stuff Junior mentioned like translatability,
>     visibility etc.
>
>     * when we hit release freeze we could copy the latest output from
>     sphinx (maybe generated as plain text file?) to INSTALL.txt and
>     remove the sources for the install docs from the QGIS code tree.
>     That way the QGIS sources always contain the current notes for
>     that release and the doc sources contain only the most recent
>     procedure.
>
>     * we could add a note in the docs sources saying ‘these
>     instructions are for the current state of the develop branch only,
>     for version specific install procedures, please see the
>     INSTALL.txt in the source tree for that release’
>
> +1 though the copy would be from the website repo (as suggested above)
>
>     I think that workflow is not too much different from the current
>     system. Of course someone needs to volunteer to get all the
>     processes above into place :-P
>
> I'd RSTed the install doc and opened a pull request at 
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/343/files. Might need 
> correction. It's the content on April 15th. Don't however know the 
> steps to keep this up to date nor automate some changes (like date of 
> doc).
>
> Regards,
>
> Harrissou
>
> 2016-05-18 8:49 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. <jef at norbit.de 
> <mailto:jef at norbit.de>>:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Wed, 18. May 2016 at 08:24:05 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> > @Jürgen regarding your comments below, I used to use apt-get 
> build-dep too
> > but I actually like the explicit package list your script generates 
> more in
> > some ways because it is deterministic compared to build-dep which 
> will only
> > reflect the deps from the current latest package in apt sources.
>
> The dependencies of the latest automatic nightly are probably more 
> up-to-date
> than the list from the latest manual INSTALL update run.
>
>
> Jürgen
>
> --
> Jürgen E. Fischer           norBIT GmbH             Tel. 
> +49-4931-918175-31 <tel:%2B49-4931-918175-31>
> Dipl.-Inf. (FH)  Rheinstraße 13          Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 
> <tel:%2B49-4931-918175-50>
>
> Software Engineer  D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de 
> <http://www.norbit.de/>
> QGIS release manager (PSC)  Germany       IRC: jef on FreeNode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing community resources 
> such as documentation, translation etc..
> Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org 
> <mailto:Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *Tim Sutton*
>
> QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
>
> tim at qgis.org <mailto:tim at qgis.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160519/76d4b019/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 4863 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160519/76d4b019/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4642 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160519/76d4b019/attachment-0001.jpe>