[Qgis-developer] Plans after friday's release?

[Nyall Dawson]

On 20 October 2016 at 17:17, Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch> wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 09:07 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>>> I'm just wondering what the plans are following 2.18's release
>>> tomorrow?
>
> I am in favor of shooting down any 2.20 plans and fully focus on 3.0 to
> reduce the backporting overhead and improve dev-time and user-awareness
> towards 3.0.
>
> We could potentially also allow some non-intrusive features to land in
> there (some plans regarding this already exist).
>
>>
>> At the moment master_2 Travis builds fail, so maybe we should
>> first make sure to be able to release tomorrow ?
>>
>> https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS/builds
>
> And looking at the failing test here, that shouldn't be something we
> should worry about:
>
> https://dash.orfeo-toolbox.org/testDetails.php?test=47814587&build=249133
>
> Plus I'd prefer to keep this discussion separate.

Should be fixed now anyway:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/7cfe0412c6dafb43942b5b4c9ed7064007209673


>
> Matthias
>
>
>>
>> --strk;
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer