[QGIS-Developer] Reword "Trusted Plugin" --> "Trusted Plugin Author"?

Werner Macho werner.macho at gmail.com
Fri Sep 8 05:37:55 PDT 2017


Hi!

I like Community contributor (more than trusted author)
but have another addition
Contributor known by the community ..
But I think that distracts us from the plugins "tag" that it is.

what about "checked" or "scanned" or something like that?

regards
Werner

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:32 PM, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Tom, thanks for your input and I'm surprised that you are not a
> trusted author (thought that have been discussed a while back).
> I was about to propose a pull request this morning with the new
> wording but didn't because either "The author of this plugin is
> trusted" or "Trusted Author" makes me feel comfortable. It looked to
> me that those who do not have this tag are untrusted. And I'm afraid
> this could harm their work and they do not deserve that.
> So, if the main idea is to promote people that have a community
> implication (and I guess we agree they deserve it), how about
> "Community contributor"?
>
> 2017-09-08 14:27 GMT+02:00 Saber Razmjooei
> <saber.razmjooei at lutraconsulting.co.uk>:
> > +1 for Tom to become a trusted author. In addition to the qgis2web
> plugin,
> > Tom is a very active in QGIS UK usergroups.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Saber
> >
> >
> > On 8 September 2017 at 13:17, Luigi Pirelli <luipir at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 to thrusted author
> >>
> >> side +1 to trust Tom... can we use the same OSGeo charters memeber
> >> mechanism to nominate thrusted authors?
> >> Luigi Pirelli
> >>
> >>
> >> ************************************************************
> **************************************
> >> * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
> >> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
> >> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
> >> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
> >> * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
> >> *
> >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-
> intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
> >>
> >> ************************************************************
> **************************************
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8 September 2017 at 13:45, Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi Tom,
> >> >
> >> > I understand this sentiment very well. Do you think formalizing the
> >> > process to become a "Trusted Author" and making it more transparent
> >> > would help here?
> >> >
> >> > Your statement does not seems not to critizise the move of switching
> >> > trust from plugins to authors. But more the "in-or-out" in general.
> >> > Important here is, that the idea is to put more stress on the "in"
> >> > rather than the "out" (by saying "trusted author" rather than
> "untrusted
> >> > author"). If you have an idea how this can be made even more visible,
> I
> >> > think there's a good chance that we can mitigate unwanted side-effects
> >> > and potentially hard feelings of this better.
> >> >
> >> > Sidnote:
> >> > I will immediately vote to make you a trusted author, we all very well
> >> > know the work you've put into qgis2web and close relations with the
> >> > community. While I think you should get the label anyway, I think
> >> > there's a different discussion you wanted to trigger here.
> >> >
> >> > Matthias
> >> >
> >> > On 09/08/2017 01:29 PM, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> >> >> So it's not that you don't trust my work, it's that you don't trust
> me?
> >> >>
> >> >> As an untrusted plugin author, I should say that this makes little
> >> >> difference. While I 100% understand the rationale behind this
> process,
> >> >> it
> >> >> still feels like a bit of a slap in the face. Perhaps the use of the
> >> >> word
> >> >> "trust", be it applied to plugin or author, is too loaded for me. In
> >> >> fact,
> >> >> transferring the usage to individuals makes it more galling - it's
> one
> >> >> thing
> >> >> for the work I have done voluntarily over the past three or four
> years
> >> >> not
> >> >> to be trusted by the core devs, but it's quite another for me,
> >> >> personally,
> >> >> not to be trusted.
> >> >>
> >> >> I of course understand that the inference is not that I and my work
> are
> >> >> not
> >> >> trusted. I simply worded that last sentence deliberately to make the
> >> >> point
> >> >> that this label, and its absence, seems arbitrary at best, possibly
> >> >> reinforces the (otherwise seldom apparent) clique nature of devs in
> >> >> general
> >> >> and the QGIS core devs in particular, and at worst is insulting.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hope you understand - I feel the point had to be made.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >>
> >> >> Tom
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -----
> >> >> Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
> >> >> --
> >> >> Sent from:
> >> >> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> >> >> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> >> > QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> >> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Saber Razmjooei
> > www.lutraconsulting.co.uk
> > +44 (0)7568 129733
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20170908/50e62609/attachment.html>


More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list