[QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

[Giovanni Manghi]

Hi Nyall

> It may not be right for the GRASS provider (it isn't - this is a bug),
> but for other providers it is, as this allows you to take advantage of
> Processing 3.0's new transparent reprojection.

right, I forgot about that. But then why not having the coordinates
show in one field, and the value of the crs in a separate one?

cheers!

-- G --