[QGIS-Developer] [server] Status and Roadmap
René-Luc Dhont
rldhont at gmail.com
Thu Feb 8 05:37:53 PST 2018
Hi Régis,
My answers in the body of your email
Le 08/02/2018 à 11:25, Régis Haubourg a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3.
>
> Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production
> environment and would like to consolidate again QGIS server.
>
> I have some informations and questions :
>
>
> # OGC certification
>
> I got in touch with the OGC certification team, in the aim of getting
> official certification, since we pass all WMS 1.3.0 tests.
> If we seek a reference implementation status on behalf of OSGEO and
> QGIS.org, there should be no fees, that's great news.
> The process must be renewed every year.
> We started the online testing process here:
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine. It's failing currently,
> probably because of IP redirections we need to fix in our reference
> server (the one used by the continuous integration system)
>
> We are asked to start evaluating WFS conformity too, but that should
> be a bit painful since there is no API in TeamEngine to make
> continuous integration, and online platform is not responding. So I'm
> not confident we'll have quick results here.
>
> If everything goes well, I think QGIS can be certified soon! I think
> this will be very interesting to advertise in the doc and website.
>
> The OGC team seems really happy to see QGIS getting in the
> certification loop, and suggest we also try to certify QGIS as a
> client. If anyone has worked in that area, that would be nice to join
> efforts.
>
>
> # Performance
>
> * We are still interested in having performance measure reference and
> ideally have performance driven development with a continuous
> integration system. Yves, is there anything new on your side?
I have made a first analyse and I will send an email to the mailing-list.
>
> * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in 2.x,
> they were not forwarded to the database when possible, and implied
> reading the whole layer in memory before doing the spatial query on
> the QGIS side. Anyone knows if it's still the case?
>
No changes here. You just have to specify a QGIS2.ini or QGIS3.ini to
speficy this.
>
>
> all the best
> Régis
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20180208/caadb587/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list