[QGIS-Developer] Drop list of "code maintainers" from docs?

[Luigi Pirelli]

I've no strong opinion in favor or against... for sure I result maintainer
for some plugins that where developed under a "company" environment. The
company should be in charge to maintain that. Anyone want to hire a
developer that have knowledge of the plugin can use git log to find who
worked on that.

so +1

Luigi Pirelli

**************************************************************************************************
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
*
https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
* Hire me: http://goo.gl/BYRQKg
**************************************************************************************************

On 12 May 2018 at 00:16, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to float this idea of dropping this list of code maintainers
> from the website:
>
> https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/governance.html#code-
> maintainers
>
> Rationale:
>
> - It's not really relevant anymore - most areas of code are "shared
> responsibilities"
> - It's horribly outdated, including developers who are no longer
> actively involved in the project and missing lots of the most active
> developers (e.g. compare to the list at
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/graphs/contributors !)
> - PRs aren't assigned based on this list - rather they are "self
> assigned" by interested developers.
>
> Any objections?
> Nyall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20180513/375e10a9/attachment.html>