[QGIS-Developer] What to do about incorrect SAGA algorithms?
Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.manghi at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 04:10:26 PST 2019
Hi Nyall,
> add some kind of warning (for the tools we know can have issue), do not
> remove, please. After all we never removed (nor deprecated) the native QGIS
> tools when we knew (sometimes since long) that they were spitting very
> wrong results...
>
> See above for my new proposal. But I'm not convinced by this argument
> at all -- it's basically saying "let's accept bugs (and the user data
> corruption and frustration which result from them) because we once had
> other bugs so it's fair".
ummm... no, I really didn't meant that. What I was thinking was that SAGA
served us well (and will still serve) when we could not really rely on some
QGIS native tools (that lead to data corruption/wrong results and user
frustration). Also thinking about moving on to newer (bug free) releases I
didn't liked the idea to see tools disappear from Processing even if we
have very good native tools now. Anyway this is now an already obsolete
consideration, the solution you already implemented is good to me.
> I understand the background you're coming
> from
I genuinely do not understand what you mean :)
cheers
-- G --
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20190306/41147feb/attachment.html>
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list