[QGIS-Developer] Should we create a list for admin sys discussions and infrastructure monitoring?

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi,
thanks for your inputs. My concern was that we are not resilient enough to
detecting regressions or failures. I get your point of finding resources to
create a dashboard, and responsibility dilution risks if we don't clarify
who is responsible for what.

Let's stay as is concerning the QGIS server performance and OGC compliance
suites. We'll forward tools failures only to Paul and me as a backup.

However there was another question about regressions detected concerning
OGC compliancy. We are currently not able to wire those to Travis directly
(that would be way tooo long), so how can we advertise for regressions to
developpers? That is why I was asking to post on developper's list or
another list. Unlike Plugin approval's messages, we expect a lot less
messages. (something between 1 an 10 maybe?).

Best regards
Régis


Le dim. 19 mai 2019 à 11:10, Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch> a écrit :

> Hi Régis,
>
> I like the idea. It's an easy solution to have an archive of past
> notifications and discussions on particular events.
>
> The main risk is, that the "responsibilities" of different lists is no
> longer clear and cross list threads are started. I don't know what's best,
> but it could even be "read only", so that only the check results are posted
> but any discussion shall be triggered on other channels.
>
> If someone is able to setup a dashboard with advanced functionality,
> filtering etc. that would of course be even nicer, but initial effort is
> higher and maintenance effort will be higher too, so it's a question if
> someone is willing to take on that job.
>
> Best regards
>
> Matthias
>
>
> On 5/17/19 5:54 PM, Régis Haubourg wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> A gentle relaunch here.  Our infrastructure is already monitored
> somewhere?
> Or do we stick to having mail received by individual maintainers?
> Best regards
> Régis
>
> Le ven. 10 mai 2019 à 15:47, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>> at Oslandia we are currently pushing the OGC compliance test suite,  the
>> performance test suite and some demo stuff QWC2 on qgis officiel servers.
>> We need to monitor those tools that produce daily reports and send mails
>> in case of failure of the tools
>>
>> We don't want to flood the developper's mailing list with such messages,
>> so we are wondering what would be the best place to send those
>> notifications?
>>
>> For the particular case of the OGC compliance test, we also now have
>> messages in case of regressions. Those messages should are not wired with
>> Travis PR workflow, so we need to raise the information probably on the
>> developper mailing list.
>>
>> Is there anything already set up somewhere we are not aware of?
>>
>> I think centralizing notification and having a dashbooard to monitot the
>> status of all the infrastructure would be nice.
>>
>> Thanks for your hints!
>>
>> Best regards
>> Régis
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing listQGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20190521/f2d0205b/attachment.html>