[QGIS-Developer] Post github issues migration clean ups - some proposals

[Denis Rouzaud]

Hi all,

May I also suggest to create a "wontfix" label?

Le dim. 26 mai 2019 à 21:46, Denis Rouzaud <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
>
> Le dim. 26 mai 2019 à 21:38, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 11:43, Denis Rouzaud <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1. But, we should indeed have a strict definition of when adding the
>> milestone (someone is taking care of the fix or every time it's just
>> considered as important). I'd rather keep milestones for PRs and maybe
>> bring back the idea of "blocker" tag.
>>
>> I think it should only be defined by someone actually assigned to the
>> bug. E.g. if I self-assign a bunch of bugs I'm actively working on,
>> I'd like to be able to use milestones to self-manage these...
>>
>
> I see, I'm just afraid to see too many issues left-open with a past
> milestone.
> But we can give it a try I guess.
>
>
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Nyall
>> >>
>> >> * Ideally, we'd block non-core-contributors from setting milestones
>> >> for issues, to avoid reporters just tagging their issue with an
>> >> upcoming milestone as a rude way of saying "fix my stuff for me"
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> >> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20190526/9e72b217/attachment.html>